Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4-7 defect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

4-7 defect

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to only have passing mentions in a few papers. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 21:21, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 23:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not meeting WP:GNG. Carbon materials can have a large selection of various defects but most (or even all) of them are not notable on their own. Anton.bersh (talk) 15:39, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.